Legal Opinion

State v. Smorgala

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1990No. 89-44PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarsha, J.

The question presented for review by this certification is whether the courts of Ohio should judicially create a public policy limitation upon the statutorily created physician-patient privilege which would allow otherwise clearly inadmissible evidence to be received in “drunk driving” cases. In keeping with the constitutional principle of separation of powers, we cannot adopt such a position. Judicial policy preferences may not be used to override valid legislative enactments, for the General Assembly should be the final arbiter of public policy.

R.C. 2317.02(B) stated as follows:

“The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DressOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Baker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State v. KavlichOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State v. TuOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. BoysawOhio Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Hubbell v. City of XeniaOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. Apanovitch (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Painter v. GraleyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. GwynneOhio Supreme Court · 2023
  5. State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2000

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API