State v. Smorgala
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHarsha, J.
The question presented for review by this certification is whether the courts of Ohio should judicially create a public policy limitation upon the statutorily created physician-patient privilege which would allow otherwise clearly inadmissible evidence to be received in “drunk driving” cases. In keeping with the constitutional principle of separation of powers, we cannot adopt such a position. Judicial policy preferences may not be used to override valid legislative enactments, for the General Assembly should be the final arbiter of public policy.
R.C. 2317.02(B) stated as follows:
“The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. DressOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Baker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. KavlichOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. TuOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. BoysawOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by103 opinions
- Hubbell v. City of XeniaOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. Apanovitch (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Painter v. GraleyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. GwynneOhio Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2000
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.