State v. Post
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert R. Brown, J.
In accordance with R.C. 2929.05(A), we are required to undertake a three-part review. First, we must review the judgment and consider the issues as we are required to do in all criminal cases. Second, we must independently weigh the evidence disclosed in the record and determine whether the aggravating circumstance the appellant was found guilty of committing outweighs the mitigating factors beyond a reasonable doubt. Finally, we must decide whether the sentence of death is appropriate after considering whether the sentence is excessive or disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Burger v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by339 opinions
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. DennisOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. HamblinOhio Supreme Court · 1988
334 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.