Legal Opinion

Williamson Heater. Co. v. Radich

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1934No. 24375PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

Tbe one question of law presented in this case is whether, in order to obtain a mechanic’s lien, tbe provisions of Section 8312, General Code, require tbe subcontractor to furnish a statement and certificate to tbe property owner as well as to tbe contractor.

Tbe defendants in error, as did tbe courts below, rely upon tbe first paragraph of tbe syllabus in tbe case of Matzinger v. Harvard Lumber Co., 115 Ohio St., 555, 155 N. E., 131, as decisive of tbe matter. It is worded as follows: “Tbe provisions of Section 8312, General Code, requiring notice to be served upon tbe owner of a structure…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co. v. BaillieOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Matzinger v. Harvard Lumber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Schuholz v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Frysinger v. LeechOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Frederick Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Ford Motor Company v. Wallace H. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API