Legal Opinion
Young v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 2, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-2129PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge
The plaintiff, Lamont Andre Young, alleges that the defendants, the District of Columbia and D.C. Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”) Officer Thurman Powell, violated the plaintiffs constitutional and common law rights when, in 2013, MPD Officers stopped the plaintiff, shot him in the back, and then restrained him with shackles and a belly chain during hospital treatment. See generally Compl, ECF No. 1. The defendants have moved for partial dismissal of the Complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Defs.’…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wells v. HenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Miango v. Democratic Republic of CongoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Phillips v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Anderson v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Anderson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.