Legal Opinion

Siler v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1957No. Civ. 22119PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

Petitioners, the widow and minor children of Joseph Horace Siler, seek review and the annulment of an order of respondent commission denying dependency benefits. Respondent commission’s finding number two, on which the order rested, is that the death of said Siler “was not caused nor hastened by any injury or injuries arising out of and occurring in the course of” said decedent’s employment. Basically, the question presented is whether the finding is supported by substantial evidence.

The relevant facts can be epitomized as follows:

The decedent, hereinafter referred to as the employee, worked…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Prager v. IsrealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Merchants National Bank v. Escondido Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Gadd v. McGuireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Murphy v. Freeholders of HudsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
  5. State ex rel. Schneider v. Midland Investment & Finance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Curphey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Reimel v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Torres v. Board of Commissioners of the Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Division of Labor Law Enforcement v. El Camino Hospital DistrictAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1970
  5. State v. KelsallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API