Legal Opinion

State v. Kelsall

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 5, 1974No. 1 CA-CR 617PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Chief Judge, Division 1.

The main issue in this appeal is whether a regulation of the Maricopa County Health Department prohibiting the maintaining of pigs within 300 feet of an inhabited house is constitutional.

Defendant, Samuel Kelsall, IV, was originally charged by a criminal complaint (misdemeanor) with violating the following regulation of the Maricopa County Health Department:

“No pigsty or piggery shall be built or maintained on marshy ground or land subject to overflow, nor within 200' of any stream, canal, or other source of water supply, nor within 300' of an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. California v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Merchants National Bank v. Escondido Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. State v. Marana Plantations, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953
  4. State v. Arizona Mines Supply Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MercurioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  2. Marsoner v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  4. Black Cloud Building Corp. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API