Legal Opinion
Reimel v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 21, 1967No. Civ. 22905PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElkington, J.
J. — These consolidated appeals primarily concern the interpretation of Business and Professions Code 1 section 24755 as amended in 1961 which relates to minimum retail price schedules for branded distilled spirits. The section is part of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act (§§ 23000-25762) which herein will be called the Act.
The individual respondents and real parties in interest were holders of off-sale general liquor licenses issued by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (hereinafter called Department). Against each respondent licensee the Department filed an accusation alleging…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rice v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Gee v. California State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- State Farm General Insurance v. JT's Frames, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Samson Market Co. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Kirby v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.