Legal Opinion

In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Deming

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1987No. J.D. 3PublishedCited by 144 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.

This case involves judicial disciplinary proceedings against District Court Judge Mark S. Deming. In this case, for the first time, the Judicial Qualifications Commission held a public hearing regarding allegations of misconduct made against a judge. Since this appeal was argued to this court Judge Deming has resigned. We answer the issues raised because of their substantial public importance. Our de novo review indicates that Judge Deming's conduct did not comport to the standards of conduct imposed on judges in this state. As the final authority which can discipline judges, we find that…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by144 opinions

  1. To-Ro Trade Shows v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. To-Ro Trade Shows v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re ChaissonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  5. Matter of SeamanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993

139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API