In Re Formal Inquiry Concerning Judge Diener
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.
Barnes, Smith and Digges, JJ., dissent and Smith, J., *662filed a dissenting opinion in which DlGGES, J., concurs and Barnes, J., concurs in part at page 697 infra. Barnes, J., filed a dissenting opinion at page 727 infra.
Here, for the first time, we must review a report and recommendation from the Commission on Judicial Disabilities, which found as a fact that Judge A. Jerome Diener and Judge Joseph L. Broccolino, Jr., now judges of the District Court of Maryland, engaged in conduct prejudicial to the proper administration of justice while serving as judges of the Traffic Division of the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Cement InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- In Re MatteraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Hyson v. Montgomery County CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Sheldon E. Pangburn v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
- In Re KellySupreme Court of Florida · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Attorney General of Maryland v. WaldronCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Berkey v. DeliaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge NowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Bar Ass'n v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.