Legal Opinion

Matter of Coruzzi

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 20, 1984PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

WILENTZ, C.J.

Society invests its leaders with many powers. No power is greater, nor its responsibilities more awesome, than that given a judge. The power to render final judgment is limited only by the law and the judge’s conscience. Society gives this power on condition that judges be independent, trusting them and no one else. Respondent sold this power, he sold his judgments, he sold his independence. He not only betrayed his trust, he betrayed New Jersey’s tradition of judicial honesty: in the more than 35 years since the creation of our new court…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. United States v. LovettSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Mullarkey v. TamboerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. State v. BeySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  3. Hills Dev. Co. v. Bernards Tp. in Somerset Cty.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. Matter of Estate of DawsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  5. Velasquez v. FranzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API