Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 3, 1985No. 38-80CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

YANNELLO, Judge.

This is a civilian pay case involving two personnel actions: (1) a separation from a term position by reason of a reduction in force (RIF) and (2) a failure of appointment to a permanent position. Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment. The facts material to this opinion have been thoroughly aired in previous adjudications summarized below, are no longer in dispute, and need not be restated in detail here.

Former Adjudication: District Court Initially

The facts were preliminarily set forth in Smith v. United States Civil…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Giordano v. RoudebushCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  4. O'Brien v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  5. Smith v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lawrence J. Ainslie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  2. Farms v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  3. Nathan Smith v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API