Legal Opinion

Farms v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 7, 1987No. 66-86CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOCK, Judge.

This case is currently before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. The Court, on its own motion, finds that it is without jurisdiction over this action. As a result, the parties’ cross-motions are denied. Additionally, because this Court believes it would be in the interest of justice to do so, this case is to be transferred to the District Court for the Northern District of Texas, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631 (1982).

Factual and Procedural Background

Since the plaintiffs’ road to the United States Claims Court has been a long and complicated one, perhaps it would…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  5. Somali Development Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  2. Doko Farms, James Porter, Allison v. Barnett, L.D. Smith and William T. Curry v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Halim v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Parks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  5. Canpro Investments, Ltd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API