Legal Opinion
Lawrence J. Ainslie v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 18, 2004No. 03-5068PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
Lawrence J. Ainslie appeals from a decision by the United States Court of Federal Claims to dismiss his claims for back pay for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Ainslie v. United States, 55 Fed. Cl. 103 (2003). For the reasons discussed in this opinion, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
Ainslie was employed by the National Guard as a technician until December 31, 1994, when he was involuntarily separated from service under 32 U.S.C. § 709. In the light of his imminent separation, Ains-lie applied for a competitive service appointment with the Department of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- First Hartford Corp. Pension Plan & Trust v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Charles B. Godwin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Constance Horner, Director, Office of Personnel Management v. Raymond Acosta, Merit Systems Protection Board, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Kramer, Mark Lee v. Rumsfeld, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- St. Christopher Associates, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Marathon Oil Company and Mobile Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Haka v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.