Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 17, 1981No. 38-80CPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBennett, Judge

This case presents the court with a procedural tangle which again illustrates one of its needs for declaratory judgment authority such as other courts of the United States have, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (1976), but denied to the Court of Claims by United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1 (1969), except where Congress has expressly granted such authority as it has done, for instance, in tax cases involving exempt organizations. 28 U.S.C. § 1507 (1976).

In the instant case, plaintiff was denied conversion from a temporary to a permanent status as a career deputy United States Marshal and lost his temporary…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  5. Cook v. ArentzenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hahn, Michael S. And Bradley, B. Shay and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Vietnam Veterans of America v. Secretary of the Navy, (Two Cases). Vietnam Veterans of America v. Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  3. Dynalectron Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  4. Blassingame v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  5. Biagioli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API