Legal Opinion

Nathan Smith v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 10, 1987No. 86-1413PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHER, Circuit Judge.

Nathan Smith appeals from a judgment of the United States Claims Court, Smith v. United States, 8 Cl.Ct. 69 (1985), dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his claim for back pay relating to a permanent position as a Deputy United States Marshal. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

The background facts of this case are detailed in Smith v. United States, 654 F.2d 50, 228 Ct.Cl. 168 (1981), and Hondros v. United States Civil Service Commission, 720 F.2d 278 (3d Cir.1983), aff'g in part and vacating in part Smith v. United States Civil Service Commission, No. 74-245 (E.D.Pa. Mar. 24, 1982).…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Joseph C. Spagnola, Jr. v. David Stockman, Director, Office of Management and BudgetCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Montalvo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Denis E. Dehne v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  2. Stanton E. Collier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  3. Collier v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  4. Farms v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  5. Athey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API