Legal Opinion

McMullin v. Murphy

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 13, 1988No. A8405-03280; CA A40071PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Plaintiff brought this action for malpractice and fraud arising, inter alia, out of the defendant dentist’s misrepresentations to her regarding the fees that he and the hospital whose facilities he used would charge to fit plaintiff with dentures. Plaintiff alleged in her fraud claim that “defendant either knew that the representations were false or made such representations recklessly without knowledge of their truth or falsity.” The jury was instructed that it could base a verdict for plaintiff on the fraud claim on a finding of either intentional or reckless misrepresentations and a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Noe v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Artman v. RayOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. McElwain v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. United States Nat. Bank of Oregon v. FoughtOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Chamberlain v. Jim Fisher Motors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ellerin v. Fairfax SavingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Telular Corp. v. Mentor Graphics Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
  4. Donald H. Hartvig, Inc. v. Clackamas Town Center AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. Howmar Materials, Inc. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API