Legal Opinion

Howmar Materials, Inc. v. Peterson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 15, 2000No. 16-97-08036; CA A102527PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

Plaintiffs sold land and a business to defendant. When defendant stopped making payments after the land flooded, plaintiffs filed a judicial foreclosure action. Defendant responded by counterclaiming for, among other things, fraudulent misrepresentation and fraudulent concealment. Defendant also sought to add a claim for punitive damages, but the trial court refused to allow him to do so. The court ruled in plaintiffs’ favor on their foreclosure action. The jury returned a verdict in defendant’s favor on his two fraud counterclaims, awarding a separate amount of damages on each counterclaim.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Building Structures, Inc. v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Kilgore v. People's Savings & Loan Assn.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Wells v. MarleauCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. McMullin v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Ricciardi v. FrinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Howmar Materials, Inc. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API