Legal Opinion

Donald H. Hartvig, Inc. v. Clackamas Town Center Associates

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 28, 1990No. 83-3-422; CA A49514PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, P. J.

This is an action for damages for fraud in the inducement of a lease. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict on its claim for punitive damages. We reverse.

In reviewing a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party in whose favor the jury rendered its verdict. Roberts v. Coleman et al, 228 Or 286, 288, 365 P2d 79 (1961). Plaintiff is the trustee in bankruptcy of Sanford’s, Inc., the owner of a chain of children’s clothing stores (Sanford’s). Clackamas Town Center (Center) is a shopping mall owned by defendant, a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whinston v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Webb v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Krause v. Eugene Dodge, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Roberts v. COLEMANOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. McMullin v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Talbert v. Farmers Ins. ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Austria v. Bike Athletic Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Sizer v. New England Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
  4. Washburn v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Bixby v. KBR, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API