Legal Opinion

Interstate Rubber Co. v. Kaufman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1915No. 18225PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Cedar county: Guy T. Graves, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is an action on a promissory note for $230. It was given for goods sold and delivered to the makers, Isaac Kaufman and Lizzie Kaufman. They made no defense. Plaintiff is payee. Chris Asmussen was summoned as garnishee. His answer shows-that he purchased from the Kaufmans a stock of merchandise for $10,000. Notice of the sale was not given to creditors of the Kaufmans in compliance with the Bulk Sales Law. Rev. St. 1913, sec. 2651. Before the writ of garnishment was served, the garnishee had paid the purchase price and had resold the stock. At the time of the sale to the garnishee,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jaques & Tinsley Co. v. Carstarphen Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Kohn v. FishbachWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Musselman Grocer Co. v. Kidd, Dater & Price Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Appel Mercantile Co. v. BarkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Marquette County Savings Bank v. KoivistoMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Owosso Carriage & Sleigh Co. v. McIntosh & WarrenTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Emmons-Hawkins Hardware Co. v. SizemoreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Knittle v. EllenbuschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Peters Branch International Shoe Co. v. GunnMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Pratt Paper Co. v. EifflerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API