Legal Opinion

Pratt Paper Co. v. Eiffler

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 22, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Story District Court. — R. M. Wright, Judge. Action by tbe trustee in bankruptcy, to have a sale by tbe bankrupt of an entire stock of goods and fixtures adjudged void, under tbe Bulk Sales Act. Tbe trial court granted tbe intervener relief to tbe extent of $300, and denied all other relief prayed for. Tbe intervener appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.

Graves & Company were a copartnership, doing business as jewelers In the city of Nevada. On April 1, *2001921, said firm, entered into a certain contract with the appellee Eiffler, by which contract Eiffler purchased the entire stock of merchandise and fixtures belonging to Graves & Company. By the terms of the contract, $500 was paid in cash by the purchaser at said time, and it was provided that an inventory should be taken of the stock, and possession given the 1st day of May following. The inventory was accordingly taken, and aggregated $4,800. On May 2d, Graves & Company executed a bill…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Daly v. Sumpter Drug Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Adams v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Fecheimer-Keifer Co. v. BurtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Coffey v. McGaheyMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Marquette County Savings Bank v. KoivistoMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Evans v. HerbransonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  2. Thomas E. Hogan, Inc. v. BermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Schramm & Schmieg Co. v. ShopeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Noltze Motor Co. v. Burrows-Moore Pontiac, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1958
  5. Hronik v. WartySupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API