Legal Opinion

Kohn v. Fishbach

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1904No. 5064PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Walla Walla county, Brents, J., entered October 29, 1903, upon findings and conclusions of the court, dismissing a garnishment proceeding, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the Court

Dunbar, J. —

This action was commenced by plaintiff against defendant on [February 24, 1903, by the filing of an affidavit for a writ of garnishment directed to said defendant, said affidavit alleging that defendant was indebted to one Sol Hardman, and had in his possession and under his control personal property belonging to said Hardman. The answer was a denial of these allegations. The reply set up the fact that Hardman had engaged in a retail business in Walla Walla county, and, while so engaged-, had become indebted to plaintiff for goods, purchased from plaintiff, and used in said retail…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fitz Henry v. MunterWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. E. B. Millar & Co. v. PlassWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Jaques & Tinsley Co. v. Carstarphen Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. McAvoy v. JenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Musselman Grocer Co. v. Kidd, Dater & Price Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Owosso Carriage & Sleigh Co. v. McIntosh & WarrenTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Wheeler & Motter Merc. Co. v. MoonMontana Supreme Court · 1914

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API