Ostrov v. I.F.T., Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge:
This is a dispute between a taxicab driver, appellant Victor Ostrov, and the administrator of the motor vehicle self-insurance plan in which Ostrov participated, appellee I.F.T., Inc. The issue is whether the trial court erred in dismissing a portion of Ostrov’s complaint against I.F.T. on the ground that the court did not have subject matter *90jurisdiction to decide issues involving the terms of the self-insurance plan because exclusive jurisdiction over such issues was vested in the Public Utility Commission (the “Commission”). We find that the trial court erred in dismissing a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Elkin v. Bell Tel. Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Modesta v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Jackson v. Centennial School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Teleconcepts, Incorporated, Defendant/third-Party v. Bell of Pennsylvania, Third-Party Teleconcepts, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- In Re Insurance Stacking LitigationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Stoloff v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Teleconcepts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- County of Erie v. Verizon North, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.