Legal Opinion

Modesta v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 1983No. 274PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LARSEN, Justice.

On March 2, 1978, appellant Patricia Modesta was injured when the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) bus in which she was a passenger was struck from behind by an uninsured motorist. On December 17, 1979, appellant demanded arbitration of her uninsured motorist claim with SEPTA. When SEPTA refused to arbitrate, appellant commenced a suit in equity demanding arbitration, uninsured motorist coverage, and judgment in the amount of $50,000.1 The court of common pleas granted SEPTA’s preliminary objection and dismissed appellant’s complaint. On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tubner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Johnson v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Johnson v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Modesta v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Lewis v. School Dist. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Ellis v. Rhode Island Public Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
  3. Hartford Insurance v. Hertz Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. McSorley v. Hertz Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. Hackenberg v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API