In Re Insurance Stacking Litigation
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOYCE, J.:
¶ 1 This is an appeal from the final order of the trial court which sustained the preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer filed by the Appellee-insurers. 1 For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the order entered by the trial court. Before addressing the merits of Appellants’ claims, we will recount the relevant facts underlying this appeal.
¶ 2 Appellants, Patricia Leed, Dorothea Fasig, Edwin Ross and Russell Floyd and his wife, Joyce, were insured under automobile liability policies issued by Appel-lees. Appellants each owned one vehicle that was insured under one…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Scarpitti v. WeborgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Moses v. T.N.T. Red Star ExpressSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Donnelly v. BauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Moser v. HeistandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Craley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Kubik v. Route 252, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Davis v. Resources for Human Development, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Erie Insurance Exchange v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- McGovern v. Erie Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.