Stoloff v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
STEVENS, P.J.:
Vanessa Stoloff (“Ms. Stoloff’), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated (collectively, “Appellants”), files this appeal from the class-action order entered in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, which sustained preliminary objections filed by Appellee, The Nei-man Marcus Group, Inc. (“Neiman Marcus”). Appellants contend that the trial court erred in dismissing its complaint against Neiman Marcus for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
We hold that any dispute involving the payment of sales tax must first be resolved by the Pennsylvania…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hannaberry HVAC v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Chanceford Aviation Properties, L.L.P. v. Chanceford Township Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Lilian v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Elkin v. Bell Tel. Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- In Re Administrative Order No. 1-Md-2003Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bennett v. A.T. Masterpiece Homes at Broadsprings, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Sulkava v. Glaston Finland OySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- J.G. Myers and C.A. Reihl v. Com. of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Emily M. Bass, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Clark, C. v. Peugh, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.