Legal Opinion

Davis v. Cahoon

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 18, 1969No. 692SC105PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

This case involves the application of rules relating to the reciprocal rights and duties of upper and lower landowners with respect to the flow or course of surface waters.

Generally, there are two well-defined and recognized rules with respect to the right of a lower proprietor to obstruct and repel surface water draining from the land of a higher proprietor. One is the common law rule frequently referred to as the “common enemy” doctrine. Under this doctrine, each landowner may take whatever steps he pleases to dispose of surface water. No natural easement or servitude exists in favor of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Phillips v. ChessonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Hocutt v. Wilmington & Weldon R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  4. Mizell v. McGowan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. Lassiter v. Norfolk & Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Magnolia Apartments, Inc. v. HanesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Dize Awning & Tent Co. v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Davis v. CahoonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Lease Properties, Inc. v. ShingletonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API