Legal Opinion

Dize Awning & Tent Co. v. City of Winston-Salem

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1976No. 7521SC987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Did the trial court err in allowing defendant’s motion for directed verdict and dismissing the action ? We hold that it did not.

First, we respond to plaintiff’s argument that the Supreme Court opinion established the law of this case, that plaintiff presented evidence substantially as alleged in its pleadings, therefore, it was entitled to have the jury pass upon its cause. We reject this argument.

The Supreme Court opinion, page 720, contains the following paragraph:

“And now, turning to the plaintiff’s position, construed most favorably to it, the plaintiff alleges that by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Barcliff v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Clark's Greenville, Inc. v. WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. District Board of the Metropolitan Sewerage District v. Blue Ridge Plating Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Hickman v. HunkinsNebraska Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API