Magnolia Apartments, Inc. v. Hanes
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtGeaham, J.
The only question on this appeal is whether the evidence, taken in the light most favorable to plaintiff and giving to it the benefit of every reasonable inference which can be drawn therefrom was sufficient to withstand defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. (See Musgrave v. Mutual Savings and Loan Association, filed in this court on this date).
The theory of plaintiff’s complaint is that defendant, through the grading of his property, diverted surface waters from their natural flow and caused them to seep through the ground at the railway right-of-way, saturating the soil on plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fenton & Thompson Railroad v. AdamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Mizzell v. . McGowanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Rice v. Norfolk & Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Davis v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Bradley v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sawyer v. ShacklefordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Cagle ex rel. Beaty v. Robert Hall ClothesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Murphy v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Lease Properties, Inc. v. ShingletonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975