Legal Opinion

Dickert v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 7, 1993No. 23810PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Justice:

We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ opinion of Dickert v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., — S.C. —, 411 S.E. (2d) 672 (Ct. App. 1991). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

Appellant Dickert (Employee) was hired by Respondent Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (Employer) in August of 1987 as a sales representative in its Columbia office. Respondent Smalley (Co-Employee) is the office manager and Employee’s supervisor.

On January 4, 1989, Employee filed suit against Employer and Co-Employee alleging causes of action for: (1) negligence based upon Employer’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stokes v. First National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Nolan v. DaleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  3. Andrews v. PetersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Loges v. MacK Trucks, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Stewart v. McLellan's Stores Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Green v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Sabb v. South Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Peay v. U.S. Silica Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Anderson v. Save-A-Lot, Ltd.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Benekritis v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1995

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API