Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Peters

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1981No. 813SC383PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

The first issue is whether North Carolina’s Workers’ Compensation Act is the exclusive remedy for an employee intentionally injured by a fellow employee. We hold that it is not.

An examination of the development of workers’ compensation laws leads to this conclusion. Before the laws’ advent, some employers voluntarily assumed financial responsibility for their injured employees. Often, however, the employees were relegated to common law tort actions. So many defenses were available to the employer — contributory negligence, assumption of risk, the fellow-servant rule —that it was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Branham v. Denny Roll & Panel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Lovette v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Bryan v. Utah InternationalUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Warner v. LederSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Jablonski v. MultackAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Pleasant v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Medina v. HerreraTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Radzisz v. Harley Davidson of Metrolina, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API