Legal Opinion

Sabb v. South Carolina State University

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 15, 2002No. 25496PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice:

We agreed to certify this case from the Court of Appeals to determine the question of whether the exclusivity provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act is procedural in nature or whether it involves subject matter jurisdiction. After finding the exclusivity provision does not involve subject matter jurisdiction, we affirm the trial court on the issues raised by appellant.

PROCEDURAL FACTS

Respondent (hereinafter referred to as Sabb) brought suit against appellant asserting claims of negligent supervision of an employee and negligent retention of an employee, as well as other…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Taylor v. MedenicaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Summer v. CarpenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Dove v. Gold Kist, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Bridges v. Wyandotte Worsted Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Callum v. CVS Health Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
  2. Hagood v. SommervilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Hawkins v. City of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Armstrong v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Proctor v. Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API