Legal Opinion

Stokes v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 14, 1991No. 23497PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Justice:

This workers’ compensation case is before this Court on a writ of certiorari from the Court of Appeals, Stokes v. First National Bank, 298 S.C. 13, 377 S.E. (2d) 922 (Ct. App. 1988). The petitioners, First National Bank (FNB), and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, 1 appeal the Court of Appeals’ holding that Respondent Danny W. Stokes (Stokes) is entitled to workers’ compensation benefits for a nervous breakdown caused by emotional stimuli or stressors alone. We affirm.

Stokes was employed as Vice President in charge of item processing at FNB’s Operations Center…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hiers v. BRUNSON CONST. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  2. Howell v. Pacific Columbia MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Wynn v. Peoples Natural Gas Co. of SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  4. Glover v. Columbia Hospital of Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  5. Kearse v. South Carolina Wildlife Resources DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Shealy v. Aiken CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Sabb v. South Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Dunlavey v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  4. Muir v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Dickert v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API