Legal Opinion
Liberty Mut. Ins. v. Cardillo
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 8, 1946No. 9086PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR K. MILLER, Associate Justice.
*530This appeal brings before us for review a judgment of the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia which affirmed a compensation award under the Longshoremen’s Act.1
The evidence clearly showed that Walter H. Ticer had been employed for some ten years before his death on December 17, 1943, by E. C. Ernst, Inc., a corporation engaged in the electrical construction business. The Ernst firm was incorporated in, had its principal office in, and did much of its construction work in, the District of Columbia. It also had substantial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Erie Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Ward v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- T. J. Moss Tie Co. v. TannerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1930
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Martin v. George Hyman Construction Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Hurley v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Liberty Mut. Ins. v. O'HearneDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1946
- Myers v. The Bethlehem Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957