Legal Opinion

Liberty Mut. Ins. v. O'Hearne

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided June 4, 1946No. Civ. No. 601PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

METZGER, Judge.

The Deputy Commissioner rendered an award in favor of dependents of the deceased employee, Upon a finding of facts in substance as follows: The deceased was engaged in going to the place he was to perform services as an oiler for the employer, and having left the employer’s time-shack, or checking-in office, sustained an accidental injury causing his immediate death when the motorcycle he was riding struck an obstruction in the road and collided with an automobile proceeding in the opposite direction.

There is no dispute that the deceased was in the employ of the Hawaiian…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Ward v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  4. Liberty Mut. Ins. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Christian v. Nicor Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Christian v. Nicor Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Raytheon Co. v. McLellanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API