Legal Opinion
Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict v. Janklow
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1981No. 13277PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSHEIM, Justice.
This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment interpretating the duties of the State Board of Water and Natural Resources (Board) and the Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict (appellant) pursuant to SDCL 46-18-38 and 46-18-42. We affirm.
The Oahe Conservancy Subdistrict is a political subdivision of the State of South Dakota created pursuant to the provisions of SDCL ch. 46-18 with the authority and duty to enter into and execute contracts to study, acquire land, construct, operate and maintain water resource development projects. To fund its functions, the Subdis-trict is vested with…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Morgan County Commission v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Evans v. West Norriton Township Municipal AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Boe v. FossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- People Ex Rel. Rogers v. LetfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- At & T Information Systems v. South Dakota State Board of EqualizationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. Big HeadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Steinberg v. South Dakota Department of Military & Veterans AffairsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Cimarron Insurance Co. v. CroyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Independent Community Bankers Ass'n of South Dakota v. State Ex Rel. MeierhenrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.