Legal Opinion

Barber v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1997No. 22283PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

This is an appeal by State Farm Insurance Company from the district court’s determination that its insureds, the Barbers, are entitled to attorney fees pursuant to section 41-1839 of the Idaho Code. The Barbers were awarded attorney fees by the district court following arbitration of a claim for personal injury resulting from a collision with an uninsured motorist. State Farm argues that the district court erred in applying Idaho law to the attorney fee issue instead of Washington law. The Barbers request an award of attorney fees on appeal.

I

BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Dayton v. Farmers Insurance GroupWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. McGreevy v. Oregon Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Brinkman v. Aid Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Unigard Insurance Group v. Royal Globe InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bouten Construction Co. v. H.F. Magnuson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Strong v. Unumprovident Corp.District Court, D. Idaho · 2005
  3. Nautilus Insurance v. Pro-Set Erectors, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2013
  4. Bouten Construction Co. v. H.F. Magnuson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API