Legal Opinion

Dayton v. Farmers Insurance Group

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1994No. 60307-3PublishedCited by 139 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

At issue in this case is whether an insured is entitled to attorney fees incurred in a UIM arbitration proceeding to determine damages. In the action to confirm the arbitration award, the trial court awarded attorney fees pursuant to Olympic S.S. Co. v. Centennial Ins. Co., 117 Wn.2d 37, 811 P.2d 673 (1991). We reverse the award of attorney fees. The Superior Court exceeded its authority in awarding attorney fees, which are not recoverable under Olympic Steamship in UIM arbitrations.

Facts

Dean Dayton was injured in an automobile collision with an uninsured motorist on April 27, 1990. Dayton…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Washburn v. Beatt Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State Ex Rel. MacRi v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Barnett v. HicksWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Thorgaard Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc. v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by139 opinions

  1. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Leingang v. PIERCE CO. MED. BUREAU, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Leingang v. Pierce County Medical Bureau, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. McGreevy v. Oregon Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1995

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API