Legal Opinion
Nautilus Insurance v. Pro-Set Erectors, Inc.
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided March 1, 2013No. Case No. 2:11-cv-00420-MHWPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
MIKEL H. WILLIAMS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court are a Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 20) and Mo*1212tion to Strike Affidavit (Dkt. 43) filed by Plaintiff Nautilus Insurance Company (“Nautilus”).1 Having considered the record, including the briefs and affidavits of the parties, and having considered the oral arguments heard on January 16, 2013, the Court will grant Nautilus’ Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court will resolve the issues raised in the Motion to Strike within the analysis of the summary judgment motion rather than addressing…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Devereaux v. AbbeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- WSP USA, Inc. v. Nautilus Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023