Legal Opinion

Strelitz v. Surrey Classics, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 25, 1946PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAFFEY, District Judge.

Petitioner in this proceeding prays for an order directing respondent to re-employ him in the same position, or its equivalent, in which he was employed prior to his enlistment in the United States Army in August, 1942. Petitioner was honorably discharged in December, 1945.

On February 25, 1946, promptly after service of defendant’s answer, petitioner served, pursuant to Rule 38(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. A. following section 723c, a demand for a jury trial of four specific issues, viz.:(1) Was petitioner employed for about eight months prior…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keene v. Hale Halsell Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  2. Hall v. Union Light, Heat & Power Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1944
  3. Sherwood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  4. Ford v. C. E. Wilson & Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1939
  5. Ransom v. Staso Milling Co.District Court, D. Vermont · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coffman v. Federal Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. Clement J. Delman v. Federal Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
  3. Ligouri v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
  4. Steffen v. Farmers Elevator Service Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952
  5. Conrocode v. Ohio Bell Tel. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API