Legal Opinion
Coffman v. Federal Laboratories, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 9, 1948No. 9545PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
The instant case presents to this Court, for the second time, the constitutionality of the wartime Royalty Adjustment Act.1 The question first came to us in TimkenDetroit Axle Company v. Alma Motor Company2 and we upheld the validity of the legislation. Our judgment was vacated by the Supreme Court and the case remanded to us with directions to determine first the non-constitutional issues of the litigation between the parties.3 This we did and the decision was rendered on patent law points involving no constitutional questions. 3 Cir., 1947, 163 F.2d 190.
This case…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Major v. BentonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Sandor Schwartz v. Cyrus S. Eaton, Walter J. Tuohy, and Cyrus S. Eaton, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Sterling Oil of Oklahoma, Inc. v. PackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Jane Does I Through III v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Paul E. Repass v. Albert L. Vreeland and Leonard G. Brown, Individuals, and Vreeland & Brown, a New Jersey Partnership in the Practice of LawCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.