Ransom v. Staso Milling Co.
District Court, D. Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
LEAMY, District Judge.
The plaintiffs have filed a demand for a jury trial of any issue triable of right by jury, and the defendant has moved that the demand be denied and that the case be placed upon the Court calendar. The basis of the motion is the assertion that the remedy sought is equitable and not within the province of a jury.
In order to determine the validity of the plaintiffs’ demand an examination of the complaint is necessary.
Paragraph two of the complaint alleges in substance that in wilful violation of the rights of the plaintiffs, that the defendant negligently, and without…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bellavance v. Plastic-Craft Novelty Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939
- Fitzpatrick v. Sun Life Assur. Co. of CanadaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
3Cited by6 opinions
- Creedon v. AriellyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1948
- Johnson v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
- Strelitz v. Surrey Classics, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- Geneux v. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1951
- All American Airways, Inc. v. Village of CedarhurstDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.