Legal Opinion
Ligouri v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 17, 1961No. Civ. No. 8340PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TIMBERS, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves, pursuant to Rule 39 (b), Fed.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., for a jury trial, notwithstanding plaintiff’s failure to demand a jury within the time prescribed by Rule 38(b), Fed.R. Civ.P.
The action is brought pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S. C.A. §§ 51-60, to recover damages for fatal injuries sustained by plaintiff’s decedent while employed as a brakeman by defendant on December 7, 1959 at Cos Cob, Connecticut.
The action was commenced by filing the complaint May 12,1960. The answer was served by mail May 31, 1960. The time within which…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Blair v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hargrove v. American Cent. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- (AMERICAN) LUMBERMENS MUT. CAS. CO. v. Timms & HowardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- VISTA CENTRE v. Unlike Anything, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Patterson v. Maher ex rel. MaherWyoming Supreme Court · 1969
- Auwood v. Harry Brandt Booking Office, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
- Burgess v. HendleySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1991
- Danmar Associates v. PorterDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.