Legal Opinion

Fortis Benefits v. Cantu

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided August 9, 2005No. 10-04-00080-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILL VANCE, Justice.

On April 12, 1998, Vanessa Cantu, then a minor, was severely injured and rendered a paraplegic in a motor vehicle ac cident. Suit was filed against, among others, the vehicle’s manufacturer (Ford Motor Company), the vehicle’s driver (Michael Patman), and Patman’s employer (Sundance Resources, Inc.). Vanessa sought to recover, among other damages, actual damages for past and future medical expenses. In March 2000, Fortis Benefits, which provided health insurance benefits to Vanessa through a health insurance policy issued to her father, intervened to recover through…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. San Jacinto River Authority v. DukeTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Garrity v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Ortiz v. Great Southern Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Columbia Rio Grande Regional Hospital v. Stover, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  5. Amberboy v. Societe De Banque PriveeTexas Supreme Court · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fortis Benefits v. CantuTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Allstate Indemnity Company v. Mary Hyman, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  3. Duke Energy Field Services Assets, LLC v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API