Legal Opinion

San Jacinto River Authority v. Duke

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1990No. C-9147PublishedCited by 224 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a summary judgment case. Duke filed suit to recover damages for an alleged wrongful termination by the San Jacinto River Authority (SJRA). Duke alleged that he was wrongfully fired by SJRA and that his case falls within the exception to the employment-at-will doctrine set forth in Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. Hauck, 687 S.W.2d 733 (Tex.1985). The trial court granted SJRA’s motion for summary judgment on the grounds that Duke did not satisfy the elements of this exception.

The court of appeals reversed, stating that the proper method for attacking sufficiency of the pleadings is by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. HauckTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Chessher v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State Bar of Texas v. EvansTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Texas National Bank v. KarnesTexas Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by224 opinions

  1. Walling v. MetcalfeTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bonham State Bank v. BeadleTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Kassen v. HatleyTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Fort Bend County Drainage District v. SbruschTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Banda v. Garcia Ex Rel. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1997

219 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API