Neeson v. Smith
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Irwin, J., entered March 8, 1907, in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for specific performance, and for damages.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
This action was commenced by Charles Neeson .against James Smith and Mary A. Smith, his wife, Lytle Logging & Mercantile Company, a corporation, and others, for specific performance and damages. The evidence shows that the plaintiff, Neeson, from January 19, 1891, to December 4, 1896, inclusive, executed and delivered to the defendant James Smith five promissory notes, for a total of $9,400, secured by mortgages on four different tracts of real estate, in Chehalis county, which we will severally designate as, the Montesano lots, the Chehalis River timber land, the Hoquiam River timber land,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ide v. LeiserMontana Supreme Court · 1890
- Waterman v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Black v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- McMillan v. Philadelphia Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Lawrence v. PedersonWashington Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Asia Investment Co. v. LevinWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Johnson v. National Bank of CommerceWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Wright v. SuydamWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- McMurry v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Citizens Bank v. MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.