Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Frye & Bruhn
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1912No. 10261PublishedCited by 21 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered November 25, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for rent, after a trial to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
This is an action prosecuted by the plaintiff as lessor against the defendant as lessee to recover rent claimed to be due upon a lease contract, made in writing, but not acknowledged. The language of the contract, so far as material to our present inquiry, is as follows:
“Market Lease.
“This Indenture, Made this 3rd day of February, 1910, by and between R. E. Anderson, lessor, and Frye & Bruhn, incorporated, lessee, Witnesseth:
*90“That in consideration of the payment of the rents and the performance of all the covenants herein contained by the lessee and in the manner herein stated, lessor does…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Brown v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Zaleski v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
- Walter A. Wood Reaping & Mowing Machine Co. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Singerly v. ThayerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
- Gibson v. CranageMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Family Medical Building, Inc. v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Edwards v. TobinOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Young v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Matzger v. Arcade Building & Realty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Wright v. SuydamWashington Supreme Court · 1913
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.