Legal Opinion

Brown v. Munger

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 10, 1890PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Smith, J., presiding, sustaining a demurrer to his answer. •

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

This action was instituted by the plaintiff to cancel and set aside a contract made and entered into between the parties, and which the plaintiff alleges has been placed on record by the defendant. From a copy which is made a part of the complaint, it appears that the plaintiff sold and agreed to convey to the defendant a leasehold estate in and upon certain described real property, situated in the city of Minneapolis, together with the buildings and improvements thereon, fully completed in accordance with certain specifications ; the title to said estate to be perfect, but subject to leases…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Townshend v. GoodfellowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Cooper v. PenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Allen v. Cerro Gordo Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1875

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. Wright v. SuydamWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Western Timber Co. v. Kalama River Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Jones v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Calder v. Third Judicial District CourtUtah Supreme Court · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API