Mosesian v. Pennwalt Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BALLANTYNE, J.
Introduction
The instant action arose after Charles Mosesian allegedly suffered crop losses on Madera grapevines in 1979 from application of Kryocide pesticide. Defendant Pennwalt Corporation (hereafter Pennwalt) manufactured and defendant Helena Chemical Company (hereafter Helena) sold the Kryocide.
The six-week jury trial ended with a defense verdict. The trial court then granted the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the ground that prejudicial hearsay statements from outside experts were brought into evidence through the testimony of Pennwalt’s primary expert…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Jiminez v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
- Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Rodriguez v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. AultCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Continental Airlines, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- People v. AultCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.