Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1978No. Civ. 51350PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JEFFERSON (Bernard), J.

By an amended complaint, plaintiff Richard Rodriguez sought recovery for personal injuries sustained while he was working on the premises of McDonnell Douglas Corporation (hereinafter, McDonnell). Named as defendants were McDonnell, its general contractor—Norman Engineering Company (hereinafter Norman), a subcontractor—Bethlehem Steel Corporation (hereinafter Bethlehem), Cox Brothers Crane Service (hereinafter Cox) and H. H. Robertson Company (hereinafter Robertson).

Joined with Richard Rodriguez as a plaintiff was his wife, Mary Anne, suing for her damages for…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Washburn v. Beatt Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. American Bank & Trust Co. v. Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hilliard v. A. H. Robins Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Heppler v. J.M. Peters Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API