Legal Opinion

In Re Horowitz

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1949No. Crim. 4854; L. A. 20199PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

This is an application for the writ of habeas corpus (Grim. 4854), with which has been consolidated an appeal from an order denying a petition for writ of error coram nobis (L. A. 20199); In these proceedings Harry Horo*536witz (hereinafter sometimes called petitioner) attacks the validity of four judgments of conviction by virtue of which he is confined in the state prison at San Quentin. For the reasons hereinafter stated, we have concluded that this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the coram nobis appeal and, further, that petitioner has not shown, in the habeas corpus proceeding,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. In Re LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Estate of Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. In Re RobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In re RenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. People v. ShipmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API